Peach v. Bruno
This text of 113 N.E. 279 (Peach v. Bruno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is wholly without merit. Where (as in the case at bar) the defendant hires from another person a horse, wagon and driver to carry merchandise from place to place as di[448]*448rected by the defendant’s servant who accompanies the driver for that purpose alone, and nothing more appears, as matter of law the driver is the servant of the owner of the horse and wagon and not of the defendant. Nothing is better settled. The cases are collected in Shepard v. Jacobs, 204 Mass. 110.
The cases relied on by the plaintiff (Boomer v. Wilbur, 176 Mass. 482, Woodman v. Metropolitan Railroad, 149 Mass. 335, and Thompson v. Lowell, Lawrence & Haverhill Street Railway, 170 Mass. 577) have nothing to do with this case.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 N.E. 279, 224 Mass. 447, 1916 Mass. LEXIS 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peach-v-bruno-mass-1916.