Peace v. Zachary Trucking Co.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 26, 2002
DocketI.C. NO. 706228
StatusPublished

This text of Peace v. Zachary Trucking Co. (Peace v. Zachary Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peace v. Zachary Trucking Co., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
At the initial hearing in this matter before Deputy Commissioner Wanda Blanche Taylor, held on 17 November 1998, Mr. Maurice Jones, owner of Zachary Trucking Co., was called as a witness for defendant, Proud Mary Trucking, Inc. When Mr. Jones testified that at the time of injury plaintiff was driving a truck under an I.C.C. number owned by Zachary Trucking Co., Deputy Commissioner Taylor ended his testimony. By Order of Deputy Commissioner Taylor entered 8 January 1999, Zachary Trucking, Inc. was added to this action as a necessary party. By Order of the Full Commission dated 22 January 2001, the Full Commission added former owner of Zachary Trucking, Inc., Mr. Maurice Jones, individually as a necessary party to the action, reopened the record in this case and remanded the case to Deputy Commissioner Taylor for the taking of Mr. Jones' testimony. Mr. Jones appeared at the hearing held on 28 March 2001 and provided his testimony for the record.

Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission adopts with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. On 24 January 1997, the alleged date of the injury by accident giving rise to this claim, Proud Mary Trucking and plaintiff were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. Plaintiff alleges an injury to his right middle finger.

3. Plaintiff and defendant, Proud Mary Trucking, stipulated into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 1, without need for further authentication or verification, plaintiff's medical records from the following providers:

• Lacy E. Thornburg, M. D., and

• Memorial Mission Hospital.

***********
EVIDENTIARY MATTERS
Plaintiff's Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32 were admitted into evidence.

***********
Based upon all the competent evidence adduced at the hearings before the Deputy Commissioner, the Full Commission makes the following additional:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner plaintiff was a 25 year old male, born 15 October 1973. Plaintiff has a tenth-grade education. After high school plaintiff worked in a kitchen, drove trucks for Youngblood, obtained his commercial drivers license when he was 21 years old, drove a log truck, spent time cutting trees and performed other driving jobs.

2. On 12 November 1996, plaintiff was hired as a driver by defendant, Proud Mary Trucking, pursuant to an ad found in the AshevilleCitizen Times Newspaper. On the date he was hired, plaintiff was immediately requested to get into a semi-truck and drive to Raleigh for two weeks to do storm clean up following a hurricane. Plaintiff drove this truck from town to town loading tree stumps. After two weeks performing this function, plaintiff was put to work driving a semi-truck over the East Coast in different states from Florida to Indiana hauling heavy equipment and large tanks.

3. Defendant Proud Mary Trucking's office was located on a farm in McLeansville, N.C. If there was a lapse of a day or so while plaintiff was waiting for a load, he was required to feed cows and do work around the farm, work in the shop running wires, help others strap down their loads and whatever he was told to do by Proud Mary supervisors.

4. At Proud Mary Trucking's facility there were four different names on the trucks as follows: Stage Coach Express, Proud Mary Trucking, Zachary Trucking and Landstar Liegen. Pursuant to the agreement between Zachary Trucking and Proud Mary Trucking, effective from 1996 to 1997, Zachary Trucking would provide Proud Mary Trucking with two trucks. In return, the owner of Zachary Trucking would receive a percentage of each load carried on the trucks.

5. Plaintiff did not own any of the trucks which he drove or any of the equipment which he used. Proud Mary Trucking's dispatcher, Mike Flemming, and its owner, Buddy Stinson, told plaintiff what to do. They determined when and where plaintiff would pick up and deliver loads. Plaintiff was at no time contacted by or given instructions by anyone affiliated with Zachary Trucking. Plaintiff was placed as the driver of the Zachary Trucking truck by Buddy Stinson. Plaintiff was issued cash advances pursuant to a TIC financial systems card which indicated that plaintiff "as defined in Sec. 390.5 is regularly driving a vehicle operated by the below named carrier and is fully qualified under Part 391, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations." The certification was issued by Proud Mary Trucking. Plaintiff was issued cash advances on several occasions pursuant to this card. Plaintiff was paid by defendant, Proud Mary Trucking.

6. On 24 January 1997, plaintiff was hauling loads of coal cars over a two-week period back and forth from Spurgen, Indiana to the Kentucky State line as directed by Proud Mary Trucking. It was raining hard and muddy on that date and as plaintiff was unloading his rig in Spurgen, he climbed up by putting his left foot on his back tire and using his right arm to pull himself up. After plaintiff had pulled his body up and as he was attempting to place his right foot on the tire, his left foot slipped from the tire. He fell and his right second finger remained caught in the handle pin. Plaintiff felt immediate pain in his right second finger.

7. Plaintiff immediately sought treatment for his injury. After plaintiff's injury, defendant, Proud Mary Trucking, required plaintiff to bring a load back home. Plaintiff was sent to Winchester, Kentucky to pick up a load before he was allowed to return home because Proud Mary Trucking would not allow him to return with an empty truck.

8. At the time of plaintiff's injury on 24 January 1997, he was driving a truck with Zachary Trucking, Inc., Madisonville, Kentucky, ICC M.C. 291061 printed on the door. Zachary Trucking was owned by Maurice Jones, who never had more than two employees at any given time. Proud Mary Trucking had three or more employees in North Carolina at all times relevant to this claim.

9. Immediately after plaintiff's injury, Tri-State Orthopedic Surgeons, Inc. of Evansville, Indiana contacted Proud Mary Trucking and obtained verification that plaintiff's injury was covered under workers' compensation and received authorization for plaintiff to be treated by Dr. Paul Perry in that practice. A billing address of Proud Mary Trucking, P. O. Box 150, Sedalia, North Carolina was given. Defendant, Proud Mary Trucking, has not paid for the medical treatment which it authorized.

10. As a direct result of plaintiff's injury to his right second finger, plaintiff suffered a central tendon insertion injury to the dorsal PIP joint of the finger, and ultimately on 5 June 1997, was required to undergo a right second finger PIP capsulectomy with extensor tenolysis.

11. As a direct and proximate result of his compensable injury, plaintiff was written out of work from 24 January 1997 through 27 March 1997, and from 5 June 1997 through 16 June 1997.

12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henderson v. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc.
319 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Watkins v. Murrow
118 S.E.2d 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Turner v. Epes Transport Systems, Inc.
290 S.E.2d 714 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Peace v. Zachary Trucking Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peace-v-zachary-trucking-co-ncworkcompcom-2002.