Peabody v. Rees

18 Iowa 571
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 22, 1864·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The decision of the court was announced by—

Wright, Ch. J.

Promissory note. The note was negotiable, indorsed before due to an innocent indorsee, and by him, after due, to the plaintiff, who had knowledge that the consideration had failed. Upon principle and authority there can be no question as to the right of [572]*572plaintiff to recover. Without more, see Story on Prom. Notes, § 191, and eases there cited. Any other rule would defeat the negotiability and circulation of negotiable paper. It is founded, in the language of Judge Story, “in the most comprehensive and liberal principles of public policy." The case of Barlow v. Scott's Administrators, 12 Iowa. 63, does not conflict with this ruling.

W. T. Barlcer for the appellant — X. McCreary for the appellee.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peabody v. Rees, 18 Iowa 571 (iowa 1864).

18 Iowa 571 (Peabody v. Rees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Ward
91 N.E. 38 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1910)
Symonds v. Riley
74 N.E. 926 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Koehler v. Dodge
47 N.W. 913 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1891)
Mornyer v. Cooper
35 Iowa 257 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)