Peabody v. Rees

18 Iowa 571
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 22, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 18 Iowa 571 (Peabody v. Rees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peabody v. Rees, 18 Iowa 571 (iowa 1864).

Opinion

The decision of the court was announced by—

Wright, Ch. J.

Promissory note. The note was negotiable, indorsed before due to an innocent indorsee, and by him, after due, to the plaintiff, who had knowledge that the consideration had failed. Upon principle and authority there can be no question as to the right of [572]*572plaintiff to recover. Without more, see Story on Prom. Notes, § 191, and eases there cited. Any other rule would defeat the negotiability and circulation of negotiable paper. It is founded, in the language of Judge Story, “in the most comprehensive and liberal principles of public policy." The case of Barlow v. Scott's Administrators, 12 Iowa. 63, does not conflict with this ruling.

W. T. Barlcer for the appellant — X. McCreary for the appellee.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Ward
91 N.E. 38 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1910)
Symonds v. Riley
74 N.E. 926 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Koehler v. Dodge
47 N.W. 913 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1891)
Mornyer v. Cooper
35 Iowa 257 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Iowa 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peabody-v-rees-iowa-1864.