Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company
148 N.E. 768, 240 N.Y. 708, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 955
This text of 148 N.E. 768 (Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, 148 N.E. 768, 240 N.Y. 708, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 955 (N.Y. 1925).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
57 N.E.2d 721 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
68 F.2d 16 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 265 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 265 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Gold & Stock Tel. Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 914 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Gold & Stock Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 914 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
50 F.2d 102 (Second Circuit, 1931)
United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
19 F.2d 157 (S.D. New York, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 N.E. 768, 240 N.Y. 708, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peabody-v-interborough-rapid-transit-company-ny-1925.