Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company
148 N.E. 768, 240 N.Y. 708, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 955
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, 148 N.E. 768, 240 N.Y. 708, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 955 (N.Y. 1925).
148 N.E. 768 (Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
57 N.E.2d 721 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
68 F.2d 16 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 265 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 265 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Gold & Stock Tel. Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 914 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Gold & Stock Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 914 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
50 F.2d 102 (Second Circuit, 1931)
United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
19 F.2d 157 (S.D. New York, 1926)