Peabody v. Gilbert

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Peabody v. Gilbert

19 F. Cas. 39, 5 Blatchf. 334, 1866 U.S. App. LEXIS 397

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1866

StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. Cas. 39 (Peabody v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peabody v. Gilbert, 19 F. Cas. 39, 5 Blatchf. 334, 1866 U.S. App. LEXIS 397 (circtsdny 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The opinion in the case of Clark v. Gilbert [Case No. 2,822] disposes of this case. The plaintiffs are banker's, and do business as such, by receiving stocks, bonds, &c., for sale, and by lending and advancing money on stocks, bonds, &c., and in default of repayment, sell the same, and, also, purchase and sell stocks, bonds, &c., on their own account, and not on commission, or for others. They also purchase and sell stocks, bonds, &c., for others, under certain stipulations as to risk, losses, and profits, which is the business of a broker, and the sales are subject to the broker’s tax.

[In 5 Blatchf. 334, this case is published as a note to Clark v. Gilbert, Case No. 2,822.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The opinion in the case of Clark v. Gilbert [Case No. 2,822] disposes of this case. The plaintiffs are banker's, and do business as such, by receiving stocks, bonds, &c., for sale, and by lending and advancing money on stocks, bonds, &c., and in default of repayment, sell the same, and, also, purchase and sell stocks, bonds, &c., on their own account, and not on commission, or for others. They also purchase and sell stocks, bonds, &c., for others, under certain stipulations as to risk, losses, and profits, which is the business of a broker, and the sales are subject to the broker’s tax.

[In 5 Blatchf. 334, this case is published as a note to Clark v. Gilbert, Case No. 2,822.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 F. Cas. 39, 5 Blatchf. 334, 1866 U.S. App. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peabody-v-gilbert-circtsdny-1866.