Peabody v. City of Lewiston
This text of 22 A. 171 (Peabody v. City of Lewiston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question is, who has the better right to demand of the city of Lewiston the wages of one in its employ, the plaintiff, by virtue of an assignment, or a third party, under an order upon the city, earlier in date, but not accepted in 'writing until after the assignment had been duly recorded.
The order could not operate as an assignment, for want of record; R. S.., c. Ill, § 6 ; nor to charge the city as acceptor, for want of acceptance in writing prior to the recording of the assignment; R. S., c. 32, § 10. The plaintiff, therefore, claiming under the assignment, must prevail.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A. 171, 83 Me. 286, 1891 Me. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peabody-v-city-of-lewiston-me-1891.