Peabody Coal Company v. Spese

105 F.3d 329, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30939
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peabody Coal Company v. Spese. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 F.3d 1001
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided November 25, 1996·No. 95-1687·Published

Opinion

105 F.3d 329

PEABODY COAL COMPANY, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,
and
Old Republic Insurance Company, Petitioner,
v.
Anabelle SPESE, Widow of John Spese, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner,
and
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United
States Department of Labor, Respondent-Cross-Respondent.

Nos. 95-1687, 95-1709.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

Nov. 25, 1996.

Petition to Review an Order of the Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor, No. 90-BLA-1856.

Before CUMMINGS, ESCHBACH and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by petitioners, cross-respondents and respondent-cross-petitioner on October 15, 1996, a vote of the active judges of the court was requested. A majority of the judges in regular active service voted to rehear this case en banc. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the opinion entered in this case on August 29, 1996, 94 F.3d 369, be, and is hereby, VACATED.

This case will be reheard en banc, December 18, 1996.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peabody Coal Company v. Spese, 105 F.3d 329, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30939 (7th Cir. 1996).

105 F.3d 329 (Peabody Coal Company v. Spese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.