Peabody Coal Co. v. Taylor

Supreme Court

Peabody Coal Co. v. Taylor

498 U.S. 935, 111 S. Ct. 337

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 29, 1990·No. No. 89-1696·Published

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondents to substitute Charles Martin, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hubert Taylor, deceased, in place of Hubert Taylor granted. Motion of respondent Martin for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion to consolidate this case with No. 89-1714, Pauley, Survivor of Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc., et al.; No. 90-113, Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, et al.; and No. 90-114, Consolidation Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, et al., infra, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondents to substitute Charles Martin, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hubert Taylor, deceased, in place of Hubert Taylor granted. Motion of respondent Martin for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion to consolidate this case with No. 89-1714, Pauley, Survivor of Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc., et al.; No. 90-113, Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, et al.; and No. 90-114, Consolidation Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, et al., infra, denied.

Peabody Coal Co. v. Taylor, 498 U.S. 935, 111 S. Ct. 337 (1990).

Pincite

498 U.S. 935 (Peabody Coal Co. v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.