(PC)Wells v. Newsom
Opinion
WADE 2 □□ VEY EONS bo PNR ewey FP Oye At Vt FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDRE WELLS, No. 2:20-cv-1557 AC P Petitioner, GAVIN NEWSOME, Respondent. Petitioner requests the appointment of counsel on the ground he is disabled. Petitioner’s request is premature because he has not yet filed a valid pleading in this case. See ECF No. 3. Moreover, this is no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas (or putative habeas) proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel at the present time. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 6, is DENIED without prejudice. DATED: August 12, 2020 . Attten— Lhar—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC)Wells v. Newsom ((PC)Wells v. Newsom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.