(PC)Ramirez v. Khale
This text of (PC)Ramirez v. Khale ((PC)Ramirez v. Khale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, 1:21-cv-01213-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 12 V. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 KHALE, et al., (ECF No. 7) 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Individuals 18 | detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees 19 | and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 20 | 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9" Cir. 2000) 21 In the instant action, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 22 | 7). Examination of these documents reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this 93 | action. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF 24 | No. 7) is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 | Dated: _ September 2, 2021 [spe ey □ 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(PC)Ramirez v. Khale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pcramirez-v-khale-caed-2021.