(PC)Ramirez v. Francisco

Opinion

een ne eee II III I IEE IE ID EINE ee FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COPIES v. (Doc. No. 9) FRANCISCO, ET AL., Defendants. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs construed motion for copies.! (Doc. No. 9). Plaintiffs request for copies should be directed to the clerk’s office. Plaintiff is advised that his pro se status does not entitle him to receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, at *6 n.2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018). Consistent with statute, the clerk provides copies of documents and the docket sheet at $0.50 per page. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Checks in the exact amount are payable to “Clerk, USDC.” Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Plaintiff’s motion for copies is DENIED. (Doc. No. 9). Dated: _ May 9.2023 Wiha Th. Doareh Hack HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

——— ' Plaintiff titles his request for relief as an “Affidavit.” A request for a court order requesting any relief must be made by motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b).