(PC)Lopez v. CDC Director

Opinion

DANIEL LOPEZ, No. 2:21-cv-02094 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS CDC DIRECTOR, et al., Defendants. By order filed January 10, 2024, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a district judge to this action. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 28, 2024 ~ Hhttrn— Mare ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE