(PC)Kauth v. Tulare County Sheriff Department

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedDecember 16, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-01733
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC)Kauth v. Tulare County Sheriff Department ((PC)Kauth v. Tulare County Sheriff Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC)Kauth v. Tulare County Sheriff Department, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH VINCENT KAUTH, No. 1:23-cv-01733 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER 13 v. Discovery Served By: February 7, 2025 14 TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF Discovery Ends: April 7, 2025 DEPARTMENT, et al., Motions to Compel Due: April 7, 2025 15 Pretrial Motions Due: June 30, 2025 Defendants. 16

17 Defendant Kenneth Jones, II has answered the complaint. ECF No. 19. Pursuant to 18 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed in accordance with 19 paragraphs 1-6 of this order. In addition, the court will set a schedule for this litigation. 20 Should this matter proceed to trial the court will, by subsequent order, require the parties 21 to file pretrial statements. In addition to the matters required to be addressed in the pretrial 22 statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, plaintiff will be required to make a particularized 23 showing in the pretrial statement in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial. Plaintiff is 24 advised that failure to comply with the procedures set forth below may result in the preclusion of 25 any and all witnesses named in the pretrial statement. 26 At the trial of this case, the plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each 27 of the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of 28 1 trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 2 produce all of the evidence to prove the case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or 3 witness testimony. If the plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, plaintiff must follow certain 4 procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify. 5 I. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 6 Testify Voluntarily 7 An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot 8 come to court unless this court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be 9 transported to court. This court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that: 10 1. The prospective witness is willing to attend; 11 and 12 2. The prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. 13 With the pretrial statement, a party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated 14 witnesses who have agreed voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file a written motion for 15 a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The motion 16 must: 17 1. State the name, prisoner identification number, and address of each such 18 witness; 19 and 20 2. Be accompanied by affidavits showing that each witness is willing to testify 21 and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. 22 The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: 23 1. The party can swear by affidavit that the prospective witness has informed the 24 party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed. The 25 party must state in the affidavit when and where the prospective witness informed 26 the party of this willingness; 27 or 28 2. The party can serve and file an affidavit sworn to by the prospective witness, in 1 which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify without being 2 subpoenaed. 3 The prospective witness’ actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two 4 ways: 5 1. The party can swear by affidavit that the prospective witness has actual 6 knowledge. However, this can be done only if the party has actual firsthand 7 knowledge that the prospective witness was an eyewitness or an ear-witness to the 8 relevant facts. For example, if an incident occurred in the plaintiff’s cell and, at 9 the time, the plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, 10 the plaintiff may swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify. 11 or 12 2. The party can serve and file an affidavit sworn to by the prospective witness in 13 which the witness describes the relevant facts to which the prospective witness 14 was an eye- or ear-witness. Whether the affidavit is made by the plaintiff or by the 15 prospective witness, it must be specific about what the incident was, when and 16 where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness happened to 17 be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred. 18 The court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses, 19 specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the court will 20 issue the order necessary to cause the witness’ custodian to bring the witness to court. 21 II. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 22 Testify Voluntarily 23 If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify 24 voluntarily, the party should submit with the pretrial statement a motion for the attendance of 25 such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition, the party must 26 indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify voluntarily. 27 III. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 28 Testify Voluntarily 1 It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated witness’ voluntary 2 attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought or 3 obtained from the court. 4 IV. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 5 Testify Voluntarily 6 If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify voluntarily, not 7 earlier than four weeks and not later than two weeks before trial, the party must prepare and 8 submit to the United States Marshal a subpoena for service by the Marshal upon the witness. 9 (Blank subpoena forms may be obtained from the Clerk of Court). Also, the party seeking the 10 witness’ presence must tender an appropriate sum of money to the witness through the United 11 States Marshal. In the case of an unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the 12 daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the witness’ travel expenses. 13 A subpoena will not be served by the United States Marshal upon an unincarcerated 14 witness unless the subpoena is accompanied by a money order made payable to the witness for 15 the full amount of the witness’ travel expenses plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. As noted 16 earlier, because no statute authorizes the use of public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the 17 tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is required even if the party was granted leave to 18 proceed in forma pauperis. 19 V. Pretrial Motions 20 With respect to the filing of dispositive motions, the parties should keep in mind that the 21 purpose of law and motion is to narrow and refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to 22 dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are susceptible to resolution without trial. To 23 accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify and fully research the issues presented by the 24 case, and then examine those issues in light of the evidence gleaned through discovery. If it 25 appears after examining the legal issues and facts that an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, 26 the parties are to file the appropriate motion by the law and motion cutoff set forth below. 27 All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motion. The parties are 28 reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to address the admissibility of 1 evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Earnest Woods, II v. Tom Carey
684 F.3d 934 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Donald Stratton v. Julie Buck
697 F.3d 1004 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Juan Albino v. Lee Baca
747 F.3d 1162 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Wyatt v. Terhune
315 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC)Kauth v. Tulare County Sheriff Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pckauth-v-tulare-county-sheriff-department-caed-2024.