(PC)Costa v. Sandoval

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 ANTHONY STEWART COSTA, Case No. 1:21-cv-1308 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO 15 Defendant. (Doc. 17) 16 17 Anthony Stewart Costa seeks to hold the defendant liable for a violation of his civil rights 18 while incarcerated at the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, California. (See 19 generally Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to obey the Court’s orders to apply 20 to proceed in forma pauperis following his release from custody and failed to keep the Court 21 informed of his current mailing address.1 (See Doc. 17 at 1-2; see also Docs. 15, 16.) The 22 magistrate judge found terminating sanctions are appropriate, after considering the factors 23 identified by the Ninth Circuit in Malone v. United States Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th 24 Cir. 1987). (Id. at 3-5.) The magistrate judge recommended that the Court dismiss the action 25 without prejudice. (Id. at 4.) 26 1 The Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for his 27 failure to comply with the order to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 16.) The U.S. Postal Service returned the Court’s mail as “Undeliverable, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to 28 Forward” on March 20, 2025. 1 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff at the address on record 2 | and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 17 at 5.) However, the U.S. 3 | Postal Service again returned the Court’s mail on May 12, 2025, marked “Undeliverable, Return 4 | to Sender, Unknown at this Address, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward.” To 5 | date, Plaintiff has not filed the application to proceed IFP as ordered or provided the Court with 6 | his proper mailing address. 7 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 8 | Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 9 | are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 10 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued April 29, 2025 (Doc. 17) are 11 ADOPTED in full. 12 2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for 13 failure to obey the Court’s orders. 14 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 15 17 | Dated: _May 22, 2025 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28