(PC) Witt v. Solano County Custody Division

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY JAMAL WITT, No. 22-cv-1042 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 SOLANO COUNTY CUSTODY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DIVISION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On August 11, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an 19 amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 20 filed an amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 3 || Cir. 1991). 4 || Dated: September 22, 2022 Card Kt | / py la 4 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 witt1042.fta 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28