(PC) Williams v. Castro

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 31, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-01617·Unknown

Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III Case No. 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC)

11 Plaintiff, TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

12 v. Telephonic Pretrial Hearing: January 20, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. 13 CASTRO, et al.,

14 Defendants. Telephonic Motions in Limine Hearing: February 8, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. 15

16 Jury Trial: February 21, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB); 2-3 Days 17

19 Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 20 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties consented to Magistrate Judge 21 jurisdiction. (ECF No. 38.) 22 This action is proceeding against Defendants Regado and Castro for deliberate 23 indifference to Plaintiff’s safety and violation of the Equal Protection Clause. 24 On August 26, 2022, Defendants filed a notice of intent to not file a dispositive motion. 25 Accordingly, this case is no ready to proceed to jury trial. This matter is set for a telephonic 26 pretrial hearing on January 20, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. The matter is also set for a 2 to 3 day jury 27 trial beginning on February 21, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. 1 In preparation of trial, the parties are required to file Pretrial Statements in accordance 2 with the schedule set forth herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in 3 the pretrial statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a 4 particularized showing in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and 5 requirements for making such a showing are outlined in detail below. 6 1. Pretrial Statement (Local Rule 281) 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 281, the parties shall file a Pretrial Statement. The parties shall 8 file their pretrial statements no later than December 30, 2022. The telephonic pretrial hearing 9 will be held January 20, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. before the United States Magistrate Judge Stanley 10 A. Boone in Courtroom 9. 11 The form and content of the Pretrial Statement must comply with Local Rule 281. 12 Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b), the Pretrial Statement shall including the following matters, 13 under the following captions, and in the following order: 14 (1) Jurisdiction – Venue. The factual and statutory basis of federal jurisdiction and 15 venue and whether there is any dispute concerning jurisdiction or venue; 16 (2) Jury – Non-Jury. Whether the party has demanded a jury trial of all or any of 17 the issues or, if not, whether a demand for jury trial made by any other party is conceded or 18 contested; 19 (3) Undisputed Facts. A plain, concise statement of the facts that are undisputed; 20 (4) Disputed Factual Issues. A plain, concise statement of each fact (and any 21 related essential facts) that the party claims or concedes to be in dispute; 22 (5) Disputed Evidentiary Issues. A plain, concise summary of any reasonably 23 anticipated disputes concerning admissibility of live and deposition testimony, physical and 24 demonstrative evidence and the use of special technology at trial, including computer animation, 25 video discs, and other high technology, and a statement whether each such dispute should be 26 resolved by motion in limine, briefed in the trial, brief, or addressed in some other manner; 27 (6) Special Factual Information in Certain Actions. In addition to the facts and 1 following types of actions shall be specified within either the disputed or undisputed facts 2 sections as appropriate: 3 (A) The date, place, and general nature of the incident; the particular acts, 4 omissions, or conditions constituting the basis for liability; the particular acts, omissions or 5 conditions 6 constituting the basis of any defense; any statute, ordinance, or regulation violated by either 7 party; the applicability of the doctrine of strict liability or res ipsa loquitur. 8 (B) Each plaintiff’s age; injuries sustained; any prior injury or condition 9 worsened; periods of hospitalization; medical expenses and estimated future medical expenses; 10 the period of total and/or partial disability; annual, monthly, or weekly earnings before the 11 incident; earnings loss to date and estimated diminution of future earnings power; property 12 damage; general damages; punitive damages; 13 (7) Relief Sought. The elements of monetary damage, if any, and the specific nature 14 of any other relief sought; 15 (8) Points of Law. A statement of the legal theory or theories of recovery or of 16 defense and of any points of law (substantive or procedural) that are or may reasonably be 17 expected to be in controversy, citing the pertinent statues, ordinances, regulations, cases, and 18 other authorities relied upon. Extended legal argument is not required in the pretrial statement; 19 (9) Abandoned Issues. A statement of all issues raised by the pleadings that have 20 been abandoned, including, for example, claims for relief and affirmative defenses; 21 (10) Witnesses. A list (names and addresses) of all prospective witnesses, whether 22 offered in person or by deposition or interrogatory, designating those who are expert witnesses. 23 Only witnesses so listed will be permitted to testify at the trial, except as may be otherwise 24 provided in the pretrial order; 25 (11) Exhibits – Schedules and Summaries. A list of documents or other exhibits that 26 the party expects to offer at trial. Only exhibits so listed will be permitted to be offered at trial 27 except as may be otherwise provided in the pretrial order. 1 (12) Discovery Documents. A list of all portions of depositions, answers to 2 interrogatories, and responses to requests for admission that the party expects to offer at trial; 3 (13) Further Discovery or Motions. Any requests for further discovery or pretrial 4 motions. Whether discovery and/or law and motion has been terminated by a Court order, 5 counsel shall set forth the grounds for relief from that order and why a motion to be relieved was 6 not made before the date ordered in the status conference for termination. Motions for relief at 7 pretrial are not favored and will ordinarily be denied unless the moving party makes a strong 8 showing; 9 (14) Stipulations. Any stipulations requested or offered for pretrial or trial purposes; 10 (15) Amendments – Dismissals. Any requested amendments to pleadings, 11 dismissals, additions or subtractions of parties, or dispositions as to defaulting parties; 12 (16) Settlement Negotiations. A statement whether settlement negotiations between 13 parties and/or a court settlement conference under L.R. 270 would be helpful; 14 (17) Agreed Statements. A statement whether presentation of all or part of the action 15 upon an Agreed Statement of Facts is feasible and advisable; 16 (18) Separate Trial of Issues. A statement whether separate trial of any of the issues 17 is feasible and advisable; 18 (19) Impartial Experts – Limitation of Experts. A statement whether appointment 19 by the Court of impartial expert witnesses or limitation of the number of experts witnesses is 20 advisable; 21 (20) Attorneys’ Fees. A statement whether attorney’s fees are sought and the time 22 and manner in which they are to be ascertained. See L.R. 293; 23 (21) Trial Exhibits. Any special handling of trial exhibits and a statement of 24 advisability of court retention of exhibits pending appeal decision. See L.R. 138(e); 25 (22) Trial Protective Order. Whether a trial protective order will be sought pursuant 26 to L.R. 141.1(b)(2); and 27 1 (23) Miscellaneous. Any other appropriate comments, suggestions, or information 2 that might aid in the disposition of the action, including references to any matters set forth in 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Williams v. Castro, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

(PC) Williams v. Castro ((PC) Williams v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luce v. United States
469 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1984)
United States v. Heller
551 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)