(PC) Wilkins v. Barber
Opinion
2.4L VV VILVIVIO VV INGVIN MVVULTIGCEI Lr Vilevicy Paye +vrst 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 KJN P BROWN, 12 Plaintiff, Vv. 14 5 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On July 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion 18 to seal medical records. (ECF No. 97.) Plaintiff argues that the medical records appended to the 19 June 9, 2020 declaration are confidential and thus there is a compelling reason to seal them, citing 20 Chester v. King, 2019 WL 5420213 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2019), and Kamakana v. City and County 21 of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). CECF No. 97.) 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of 23 this order, counsel for defendant Mansour shall file a response to plaintiff's motion to seal (ECF 24 No. 97). 25 Dated: July 29, 2020 26 Al Norra 27 KENDALL J. Wha pwilk1338.mts UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Wilkins v. Barber ((PC) Wilkins v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.