(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW CONSENT TO 13 vs. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION (ECF No. 53.) 14 HICKS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Tracye Benard Washington, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with plaintiff’s original 19 complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional 20 Officer Hipolito Rocha for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF 21 No. 1.)1 22 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his consent to the Magistrate 23 Judge’s jurisdiction. (ECF No. 53.) Since this action has not yet been reassigned to the 24 undersigned, plaintiff may withdraw his consent without demonstrating good cause or 25 extraordinary circumstances. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 26 1993) (“Once a civil case is referred to a magistrate judge under section 636(c), the reference can 27 28 1 On June 22, 2020, the court issued an order dismissing all other claims and defendants from this action, based on plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 19.) 1 be withdrawn by the court only ‘for good cause shown on its own motion, or under extraordinary 2 circumstances show by any party.’”). Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the court will grant 3 plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his consent. A United States District Judge is already assigned to 4 this action. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to withdraw consent to 6 magistrate judge jurisdiction, filed on May 25, 2021, is GRANTED. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8

9 Dated: May 27, 2021 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28