(PC) Villalobos v. Tiggs-Brown, P.A
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RAMON DANIEL VILLALOBOS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00442-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR v. DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT STEPHEN SHELLANS, JR., WITH PREJUDICE ARMENTA TIGGS-BROWN, P.A, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 23) Plaintiff, Ramon Daniel Villalobos, and Defendants, Armenta Tiggs-Brown and Stephen Shellans, Jr., have filed a stipulation to dismiss Defendant Stephen Shellans, Jr., M.D., with prejudice (ECF No. 23). In light of the stipulation, the case against Defendant Stephan Shellans has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Defendant Stephan Shellans. See 91 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is directed to designate the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) as terminated. T IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ November 5, 2019 [see hey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Villalobos v. Tiggs-Brown, P.A ((PC) Villalobos v. Tiggs-Brown, P.A) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.