(PC) Vasquez v. Maner

E.D. California

(PC) Vasquez v. Maner

DecidedApril 11, 2025

Docket1:24-cv-00862

StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Vasquez v. Maner ((PC) Vasquez v. Maner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PC) Vasquez v. Maner, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK VASQUEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00862-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO THE 13 v. PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 14 D. MANER, (ECF No. 28) 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On April 10, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice 20 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been 21 resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 28.) 22 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action 23 without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 24 appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 25 automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. 26 Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 637 F. App’x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space 27 Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999)). Here, Plaintiff and counsel for 28 1 | Defendant have signed and dated a stipulation to dismiss this action, and filed it with the Court. 2 In light of parties’ stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is terminated by 3 | operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). Each party 4 | is to bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to 5 || terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close this action. However, pursuant to the 6 || parties’ request, the Court will retain jurisdiction for six months for the purpose of enforcing the 7 | settlement. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 10 | Dated: _ April 11, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE 11 United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK VASQUEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00862-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO THE 13 v. PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 14 D. MANER, (ECF No. 28) 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On April 10, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice 20 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been 21 resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 28.) 22 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action 23 without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 24 appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 25 automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. 26 Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 637 F. App’x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space 27 Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999)). Here, Plaintiff and counsel for 28 1 | Defendant have signed and dated a stipulation to dismiss this action, and filed it with the Court. 2 In light of parties’ stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is terminated by 3 | operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). Each party 4 | is to bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to 5 || terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close this action. However, pursuant to the 6 || parties’ request, the Court will retain jurisdiction for six months for the purpose of enforcing the 7 | settlement. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 10 | Dated: _ April 11, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE 11 United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PC) Vasquez v. Maner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-vasquez-v-maner-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack