P.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

P.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services

773 So. 2d 1262, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16644, 2000 WL 1853975

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in P.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11594 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2000·No. No. 3D00-2144·Published

Opinion

ON JOINT MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellee’s joint motion for clarification, withdraw our previous opinion dated October 18, 2000, and substitute the following:

We grant the Department of Children and Family Services and the attorney ad litem’s joint motion for clarification. It is our conclusion that the trial court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 61.1308(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), thus we reverse the order of the trial court dismissing the dependency petitions of the Department of Children and Family Services and the child’s attorney ad litem. The cause is remanded for further proceedings on said dependency petitions, including the question of the mother’s fitness. All parties, including P.C. through his counsel, shall be permitted to participate fully in said proceedings. The mother’s motion for clarification is denied.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON JOINT MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellee’s joint motion for clarification, withdraw our previous opinion dated October 18, 2000, and substitute the following:

We grant the Department of Children and Family Services and the attorney ad litem’s joint motion for clarification. It is our conclusion that the trial court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 61.1308(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), thus we reverse the order of the trial court dismissing the dependency petitions of the Department of Children and Family Services and the child’s attorney ad litem. The cause is remanded for further proceedings on said dependency petitions, including the question of the mother’s fitness. All parties, including P.C. through his counsel, shall be permitted to participate fully in said proceedings. The mother’s motion for clarification is denied.

Reversed and remanded.

P.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 773 So. 2d 1262, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16644, 2000 WL 1853975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

773 So. 2d 1262 (P.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.