(PC) Taylor v. Hammoudeh

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, 7 Case No. 21-cv-01159-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 9 S. HAMMOUDEH, et al., 10 Defendants. 11

12 Plaintiff has filed a motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in this action. Dkt. 13 29. He names a prisoner rights lawyer named Charles Francis Carbone, who “is interested and 14 willing to be appointed to this case.” Id. at 1. 15 There is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case unless an indigent litigant may lose 16 his physical liberty if he loses the litigation. See Lassiter v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 25 17 (1981); Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997) (no constitutional right to counsel 18 in § 1983 action), withdrawn in part on other grounds on reh’g en banc, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 19 1998) (en banc). The court may ask counsel to represent an indigent litigant under 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915 only in “exceptional circumstances,” the determination of which requires an evaluation of 21 both (1) the likelihood of success on the merits, and (2) the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his 22 claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See id. at 1525; Terrell v. 23 Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th 24 Cir. 1986). Both of these factors must be viewed together before reaching a decision on a request 25 for counsel under section 1915. See id. 26 The Court is unable to assess at this time whether exceptional circumstances exist which 27 would warrant seeking volunteer counsel to accept a pro bono appointment. The proceedings are 1 the merits. Moreover, Plaintiff has been able to articulate his claims adequately pro se in light of 2 the complexity of the issues involved. See Agyeman v. Corrs. Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 3 (9th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, the request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without 4 prejudice. This does not mean, however, that the Court will not consider appointment of counsel 5 at a later juncture in the proceedings; that is, after Defendants have filed their dispositive motion 6 such that the Court will be in a better position to consider the procedural and substantive matters at 7 issue. Therefore, Plaintiff may file a renewed motion for the appointment of counsel after 8 Defendants’ dispositive motion has been filed. If the Court decides that appointment of counsel is 9 || warranted at that time, it will seek volunteer counsel to agree to represent Plaintiff pro bono. 10 The Court notes that Plaintiff may decide on his own to retain an attorney, such as Attorney 11 Carbone, if he wishes to do so. 12 This Order terminates Docket No. 29. 5 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. |! Dated: May 6, 2021 Capt Mg fc J E YVONNE GON EZ ROGERS 2 15 ited States District Judge

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28