(PC) Taylor v. Cameron

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-02353-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED AS 14 N. CAMERON, et al., PREMATURE 15 Defendants. ECF No. 27 16 ORDER 17 DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT 18 ECF No. 29 19

20 21 22 Defendants’ have filed a motion seeking additional time to respond to plaintiff’s first 23 amended complaint, ECF No. 29, and a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, 24 ECF No. 28. However, shortly before defendants filed their motions, plaintiff filed a motion to 25 amend his complaint, ECF No. 26, and a motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 27. 26 In light of plaintiff’s motion to amend, I will deny defendants’ motion for additional time, 27 ECF No. 29, as moot and recommend that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 27, 28 be denied as premature. Plaintiff’s motion to amend has not been fully briefed and the parties 1 | have not completed discovery. Before addressing either the motion to amend or the motion to 2 | revoke plaintiffs in forma pauperis status, I will await the parties’ responses. 3 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendants’ motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 4 | 29, is denied. 5 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 6 | 27, be denied as moot. 7 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 8 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within fourteen days of 9 | service of these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the 10 | court and serve a copy on all parties. Any such document should be captioned “Objections to 11 | Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations,” and any response shall be served and filed 12 | within fourteen days of service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file 13 | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See 14 | Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 15 1991). 16 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 ( q oy — Dated: _ October 2, 2024 19 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28