(PC) Taylor v. Allison

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:21-cv-00831-DJC-EFB (PC) 9 Plaintiff, 10 Vv. ORDER 1] A. BALAJL, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner pursuing a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On 15 | January 12, 2024, the court granted defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiffs in forma pauperis 16 || status and ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 30 days. ECF No. 57. Plaintiff has filed a 17 | motion for an extension of time of 150 days to pay the filing fee. ECF No. 58. 18 An extension of time of the duration requested by plaintiff would unreasonably delay the 19 | progress of this case. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936) (courts have inherent 20 || power “to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for 21 || itself, for counsel, and for litigants”). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's 22 || January 26, 2024 motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 58) is GRANTED IN PART, and 23 || plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will 24 || result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. > Daten EBE 26 || Dated: March 25, 2024 Za 1 "hil 7 LACK EDMUND F. BRENNAN 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28