(PC) Spillard v. Costa

E.D. California

(PC) Spillard v. Costa

DecidedFebruary 11, 2021

Docket2:20-cv-00702

StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Spillard v. Costa ((PC) Spillard v. Costa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PC) Spillard v. Costa, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EVERETT L. SPILLARD, II, No. 2:20-cv-0702 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 COSTA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed December 30, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 26 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 27 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 28 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 1 | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 2 | 1991). 3 || Dated: February 10, 2021 ff Pee a4 / / ) i /- it LE 9 4 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 4 9 spil0702.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EVERETT L. SPILLARD, II, No. 2:20-cv-0702 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 COSTA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed December 30, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 26 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 27 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 28 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 1 | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 2 | 1991). 3 || Dated: February 10, 2021 ff Pee a4 / / ) i /- it LE 9 4 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 4 9 spil0702.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PC) Spillard v. Costa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-spillard-v-costa-caed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack