(PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals

E.D. California

(PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals

DecidedAugust 25, 2021

Docket2:21-cv-01213

StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals ((PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REGINALD E. SPEARMAN, No. 2:21-cv-1213 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. By an order filed July 19, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 19 affidavit, which includes the requirement that he provide a certified copy of his inmate trust 20 account statement, or pay the required court filing fees, and was cautioned that failure to do so 21 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now 22 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required 23 documents or paid the filing fee. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 25 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 26 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 2 || with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 4 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 5 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 || Dated: August 25, 2021 Foci) Aharon 8 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 /speal213.fifp 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REGINALD E. SPEARMAN, No. 2:21-cv-1213 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. By an order filed July 19, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 19 affidavit, which includes the requirement that he provide a certified copy of his inmate trust 20 account statement, or pay the required court filing fees, and was cautioned that failure to do so 21 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now 22 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required 23 documents or paid the filing fee. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 25 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 26 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 2 || with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 4 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 5 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 || Dated: August 25, 2021 Foci) Aharon 8 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 /speal213.fifp 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-spearman-v-department-of-state-hospitals-caed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack