(PC) Smith v. Petrey
Opinion
DEL LAMONT SMITH, Case No. 1:19-cv-01169-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY ACTION v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE OR TO KYLE PETREY, et al., SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. (ECF No. 7) THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Del Lamont Smith is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 21, 2019, Plaintiff initiated the instant action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On August 26, 2019, the instant action was transferred to this Court. (ECF No. 4.) On September 6, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or, in the alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action, within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of the order. (ECF No. 7.) However, the deadline for Plaintiff to comply with the Court’s September 6, 2019 has passed, and Plaintiff has not submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the $400.00 filing fee, or otherwise responded in any way to the Court’s order. Local Rule 110 provides that “[flailure of ... a party to comply ... with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” Further, a plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders and prosecute their action is grounds for dismissal. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226-29 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall EITHER: a. Submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis; OR b. Pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action; OR c. Show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s September 6, 2019 order; 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner; and 3. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the District Judge that the instant action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. OF. nf ee Dated: _November 4, 2019 _ Of UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Smith v. Petrey ((PC) Smith v. Petrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.