(PC) Smith v. Aubuchon

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 10, 2019·No. 2:14-cv-00775·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 GRANVILLE WILLIAM SMITH, No. 2:14-CV-0775-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 B. AUBUCHON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for the court to provide a copy of 19 the transcript of his deposition at public expense (ECF No. 113). Plaintiff’s motion is denied 20 because the expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is only proper when 21 authorized by Congress, see Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210, 211 (9th Cir. 1989), and the 22 expenditure requested by plaintiff has not been so authorized, see e.g. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 24 25 Dated: September 9, 2019 Sx

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Smith v. Aubuchon, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

(PC) Smith v. Aubuchon ((PC) Smith v. Aubuchon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related