(PC) Singanonh v. Rodriguez

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMay 14, 2020
Docket1:18-cv-00590
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Singanonh v. Rodriguez ((PC) Singanonh v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Singanonh v. Rodriguez, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00590-AWI-EPG (PC) 6 Plaintiff, MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND 7 PLAINTIFF A COPY OF LOCAL RULE 281(b) 8 v.

9 Exhaustion Motions: March 27, 2020

10 Motions to Compel: September 1, 2020 RODRIGUEZ, et al., 11 Responses to Motions Defendants. To Compel: Fourteen days after 12 motion is filed

13 Non-expert Discovery: October 30, 2020 14 Dispositive Motions: January 20, 2021 15 Expert Disclosures: April 19, 2021 16 Rebuttal Expert 17 Disclosures: May 19, 2021

18 Plaintiff’s Pretrial 19 Statement: June 18, 2021

20 Defendant(s)’ Pretrial Statement: July 19, 2021 21 Telephonic Trial 22 Confirmation Hearing: August 19, 2021 Time: 10:00 a.m. 23 Courtroom 2 (AWI) 24 Trial: October 19, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. 25 Courtroom 2 (AWI) 26 As the Court granted Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling conference order (ECF 27 No. 54), the Court issues this modified scheduling order. 28 1 I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 2 The parties are now granted leave to serve discovery in addition to that provided as part of 3 initial disclosures. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall 4 proceed as follows: 5 1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 6 Procedure 5 and Local Rule 135. Discovery requests and responses shall not be filed 7 with the Court unless required by Local Rules 250.2, 250.3, or 250.4 (providing that 8 discovery requests shall not be filed unless or until there is a proceeding in which the 9 document or proof of service is at issue). A party may serve on any other party no 10 more than 25 interrogatories, 25 requests for production of documents, and 25 requests 11 for admission. On motion, these limits may be increased for good cause. 12 2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the 13 request is first served. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily 14 overruled by the Court. Responses to document requests shall include all documents 15 within a party’s possession, custody or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents 16 are deemed within a party’s possession, custody, or control if the party has actual 17 possession, custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to obtain the property on 18 demand. 19 3. If any party or third party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, that party or 20 third party shall provide a privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date, 21 author, recipients, general subject matter, and basis of the privilege within thirty (30) 22 days after the date that responses are due. The privilege log shall simultaneously be 23 filed with the Court. Failure to provide and file a privilege log within this time 24 shall result in a waiver of the privilege. Claims of privilege may be challenged via a 25 motion to compel. 26 4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), Defendant(s) may depose 27 any witness confined in a prison on the condition that, at least fourteen (14) days 28 before such a deposition, Defendant(s) serve all parties with the notice required by 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Plaintiff’s failure to participate in a 2 properly noticed deposition could result in sanctions against Plaintiff, including 3 monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 4 Procedure 30(b)(4), the parties may take any deposition under this section by video 5 conference without a further motion or order of the Court. Due to security concerns 6 and institutional considerations not applicable to Defendant(s), Plaintiff must seek 7 leave from the Court to depose incarcerated witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of 8 Civil Procedure 30(a)(2). Nothing herein forecloses a party from bringing a motion 9 for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) if necessary. 10 5. With the Court’s permission, Plaintiff may serve third party subpoenas, including on 11 the County of Fresno and/or Corizon, if Plaintiff seeks documents from entities that 12 are not presently defendants in this case. To issue a subpoena on these entities, or any 13 other third parties, Plaintiff must file a request for the issuance of a subpoena duces 14 tecum with the Court. If the Court approves the request, it may issue Plaintiff a 15 subpoena duces tecum, commanding the production of documents from a non-party, 16 and may command service of the subpoena by the United States Marshals Service. 17 Fed. R. Civ. P. 45; 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). However, the Court will consider granting 18 such a request only if the documents sought from the non-party are not equally 19 available to Plaintiff and are not obtainable from Defendant(s) through a Rule 34 20 request for production of documents. In any request for a subpoena, Plaintiff must: (1) 21 identify with specificity the documents sought and from whom; and (2) make a 22 showing in the request that the records are only obtainable through a third party. The 23 documents requested must also fall within the scope of discovery allowed in this 24 action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). 25 6. The parties are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and the 26 failure to do so may result in the payment of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of 27 Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other appropriate sanctions authorized by the Federal 28 Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules. 1 7. The parties have until September 1, 2020, to file motion(s) to compel further 2 discovery responses. The motion(s) should include a copy of the request(s) and any 3 response to the request(s) at issue. The responding party may file a response to the 4 motion to compel no later then fourteen days after the motion to compel is filed. If, 5 after reviewing the motion(s) and response(s), the Court determines that a hearing will 6 be helpful, the Court will set a hearing on the motion(s) to compel. 7 II. PAGE LIMITS AND COURTESY COPIES 8 The parties are advised that unless prior leave of the Court is obtained before the filing 9 deadline,1 all moving and opposition briefs or legal memoranda shall not exceed twenty-five (25) 10 pages. Reply briefs by the moving party shall not exceed ten (10) pages. These page limits do 11 not include exhibits. 12 Defendant(s) shall mail or deliver courtesy hard-copies of all motions over 10 pages in 13 length to the court at 2500 Tulare St., Room 1501, Fresno, CA 93721. Courtesy hard-copies 14 shall reflect the CM/ECF document numbers and pagination. 15 III. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 16 The deadline for the completion of all non-expert discovery is October 30, 2020. All 17 non-expert discovery must be provided by this date. 18 IV. EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES 19 The deadline for all parties to serve their expert disclosures is April 19, 2021. Parties 20 have until May 19, 2021, to serve their rebuttal expert disclosures. 21 V.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Singanonh v. Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-singanonh-v-rodriguez-caed-2020.