(PC) Sharp v. Carter
Opinion
ANTHONY A. SHARP, Case No. 1:19-cv-01568-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S “WISH TO DISMISS THIS ACTION,” CONSTRUED v. AS A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (ECF No. 7) Defendant. Plaintiff Anthony S. Sharp is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Petitioner Wish to Dismiss this Action,” which the Court construes as a request to voluntarily dismiss this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. 7.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), “a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted). No defendant in this action has served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. /// /// /// Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee Dated: _ November 19, 2019 ;
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Sharp v. Carter ((PC) Sharp v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.