(PC) Segura v. Coelho

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: June 17, 2025
• Docket: 1:23-cv-00780
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OMAR SEGURA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00780-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 14 COELHO, (ECF No. 44) 15 Defendant. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Omar Segura (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Coelho (“Defendant”) for excessive force 20 in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 21 On May 14, 2025, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that 22 the undisputed facts establish that Defendant did not use excessive force against Plaintiff. (ECF 23 No. 44.) In the motion, Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a 24 motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 25 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir. 1988). 26 (ECF No. 44-1.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), 27 Plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition was due on or before June 9, 2025. The 28 deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment has expired, and 1 he has not otherwise been in contact with the Court. Plaintiff will be permitted one final 2 opportunity to show cause why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice. 3 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause by WRITTEN 4 RESPONSE within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order why this action should not be 5 dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may comply with the Court’s order 6 by filing an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s May 14, 2025 motion for 7 summary judgment. Plaintiff is warned that if he fails to comply with the Court’s order, this 8 matter will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

11 Dated: June 17, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28