(PC) Schmaus v. Covello

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 12, 2023·No. 2:20-cv-01356·Unknown

Opinion

JASON ERIK SCHMAUS, No. 2:20-cv-1356 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. COVELLO, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 46. In support of the request, plaintiff states that he has been hospitalized close to 20 months in the last three years. Id. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. //// //// //// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 46) is DENIED. DATED: June 12, 2023 ~ Httwn— ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Schmaus v. Covello, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

(PC) Schmaus v. Covello ((PC) Schmaus v. Covello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related