(PC) Roberts v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 19, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-01349·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, No. 2:20-cv-01349 DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights by improperly taking funds from 18 his prison trust account and withholding his legal mail. By order dated January 15, 2021, the 19 court screened the complaint and determined it did not contain any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 20 9.) Plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to 21 file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF 22 No. 9 at 8-9.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, 23 requested additional time to file an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s 24 order. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to 25 prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. 26 For the reasons state above, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to randomly assign a 27 district judge to this action. 28 //// 1 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 2 | Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty days after 5 | being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 6 | the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 7 | Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 8 | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 9 | Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991), 10 | Dated: April 16, 2021 11 12 B ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 DB:14 17 | pp:1/orders/Prisoner/Civil Rights/robe1349.£&r.dism 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Roberts v. Lynch, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PC) Roberts v. Lynch ((PC) Roberts v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related