(PC) Ring v. Rasheed

E.D. California

(PC) Ring v. Rasheed

DecidedJanuary 16, 2020

Docket1:20-cv-00069

StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Ring v. Rasheed ((PC) Ring v. Rasheed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PC) Ring v. Rasheed, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4

5 ANDREW ARLINGTON RING, 1:20-cv-00069-GSA (PC)

6 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT A 7 v. NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 8 KARIM RASHEED, et al., OR PAY THE $400.00 FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 12 § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 13 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 14 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 15 Plaintiff has not paid the $400.00 filing fee, or submitted an application to proceed in 16 forma pauperis on the appropriate form pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Accordingly, IT IS 17 HEREBY ORDERED that: 18 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff the attached form for application to 19 proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner; 20 2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the 21 completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the 22 alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will 23 result in dismissal of this action.

24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 16, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4

5 ANDREW ARLINGTON RING, 1:20-cv-00069-GSA (PC)

6 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT A 7 v. NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 8 KARIM RASHEED, et al., OR PAY THE $400.00 FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 12 § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 13 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 14 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 15 Plaintiff has not paid the $400.00 filing fee, or submitted an application to proceed in 16 forma pauperis on the appropriate form pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Accordingly, IT IS 17 HEREBY ORDERED that: 18 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff the attached form for application to 19 proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner; 20 2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the 21 completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the 22 alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will 23 result in dismissal of this action.

24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 16, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PC) Ring v. Rasheed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-ring-v-rasheed-caed-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack