(PC) Reid v. Rivera
Opinion
TOMMY JAY EUGENE JOSEPH REID, No. 2:23-cv-01937-SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS RIVERA, et al., Defendants. By order filed July 24, 2024, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: September 16, 2024 md SEAN C. RIORDAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Reid v. Rivera ((PC) Reid v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.