(PC) Ramirez v. CDCR - California Corrections

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 4, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-01688·Unknown

Opinion

JOSE RAMIREZ, 1:19-cv-01688-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE vs. BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, CDCR, et al., FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 6.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

Jose Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On October 21, 2020, the court screened the Complaint and issued an order dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 9.) The thirty-day deadline has now expired and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. As a result there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order, failure to prosecute, and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983; and 2. The Clerk be directed to close this case. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Ramirez v. CDCR - California Corrections, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Ramirez v. CDCR - California Corrections ((PC) Ramirez v. CDCR - California Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related