(PC) Quiroz v. United States
This text of (PC) Quiroz v. United States ((PC) Quiroz v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA g || CRISTOBAL RAMOS QUIROZ, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00364-SAB (PC) ? Planar ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 10 V. ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 11 || UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (ECF No. 4) 12 Defendant. fif- 14 Plaintiff Cristobal Ramos Quiroz is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 15 || Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 16 On March 11, 2021, the Court sent Plaintiff a regular civil in forma pauperis application, 17 || directed Plaintiff to complete and submit the form or pay the $402.00 filing fee within thirty days. 18 || (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has failed to comply with the order and the time to so has now passed. 19 || Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show 20 || cause why this action should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this order will result in a 31 || recommendation that the action be dismissed. 22 93 || IT IS SO ORDERED. Al (ee 24 || Dated: _ April 19, 2021 OF 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(PC) Quiroz v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-quiroz-v-united-states-caed-2021.