(PC) Puckett v. Liu
Opinion
DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, No. 2:19-cv-02437-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER H. LIN, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that he could file objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has indicated that he does not object to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 21.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 3, 2020 are adopted in full; and 2. All claims and defendants not specifically identified in the December 3, 2020 order and findings and recommendations are DISMISSED. DATED: January 14, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Puckett v. Liu ((PC) Puckett v. Liu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.