(PC) Price v. Warden

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 SCOTT RICHARD PRICE, No. 2:23-cv-01229 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. 16 17 By order filed January 8, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to 21 a United States District Judge. 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 //// 28 //// 1 | with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st, 951 F.2d 1153 4 | (9th Cir. 1991). 5 | Dated: April 10, 2024 6 7 g ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 DB16 12 DB/Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/pric.1229.fta 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28