(PC) Price v. Burkhart
Opinion
IMMANUEL C. PRICE, No. 2:22-cv-2306 WBS CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 20, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 28) are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f; Local Rule 110. Dated: December 30, 2024 he Lhe ak. (ht, t~<—- UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE spric22cv2306.801
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Price v. Burkhart ((PC) Price v. Burkhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.