(PC) Pradia, Jr. v. Baccera

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 2, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-01348·Unknown

Opinion

CARL LAPRA PRADIA, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01348-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT

A. BECERRA, et al., (Doc. 16) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff has filed a motion for a default judgment. (Doc. 16.) Plaintiff’s motion is premature. The Court directed service of process on Defendants on August 24, 2021, (Doc. 13); however, Defendants have not yet been served. On November 1, 2021, CDCR filed a notice of intent to waive service on Defendants’ behalf. (Doc. 18.) Pursuant to the Court’s order directing service, Defendants have 60 days from November 1 to file an answer to the complaint. (See Doc. 13 at 2.) Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment be DENIED as premature. These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days of the date of service of these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned, “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 1, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Pradia, Jr. v. Baccera, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PC) Pradia, Jr. v. Baccera ((PC) Pradia, Jr. v. Baccera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related