(PC) Patterson v. HIP-C Committee
Opinion
VESTER L. PATTERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01401-NONE-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF v. THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE
JOHN DOES 1–18, Defendants. Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on November 19, 2021. (Doc. 33.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). /// /// /// /// /// Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal and no opposing party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to terminate all pending motions and to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 22, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Patterson v. HIP-C Committee ((PC) Patterson v. HIP-C Committee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.