(PC) Outman v. Paramo

District Court, S.D. California·Decided January 31, 2020·No. 3:18-cv-02101·Unknown

Opinion

ROBERT H. OUTMAN, Case No.: 3:18-cv-02101-BAS-KSC CDCR #P-79939, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Plaintiff, vs. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; S. SANCHEZ, Captain; WILLIAMS, Correctional Counselor I; C. YORK, CCI; M. VILLATUERLE, CCII; B. VOGEL, CCI; B. OLIVARRIA, Appeals Coordinator; B. SELF; K. RODRIGUEZ, Psychologist; S. BAHRO, Ph.D Psychologist; JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10, Supervisory Mental Health Staff; JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10, Custody Staff, Defendants. Plaintiff Robert H. Outman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. He brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials and employees. On June 11, 2019, Defendants B. Vogel, R. Olivarria, S. Bahro, S. Searles (formerly Sanchez), K. Rodriguez, B. Self, D. Paramo, M. Villafuerte, and C. York moved dismiss Plaintiff's claims against them. (ECF No. 22.) Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court grant the motion to dismiss as to all of the Defendants named in the Complaint. (ECF No. 32.) On December 19, 2019, the Court issued an order adopting Judge Crawford’s R&R granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 33.) The Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ Complaint in its entirety but granted Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint. In its Order, the Court stated: “If Plaintiff chooses to amend his Complaint, he must file the First Amended Complaint no later than January 21, 2020. The Court warns Plaintiff that a failure to file a First Amended Complaint by January 21, 2020, will result in the Court dismissing this action and closing the case.” (/d. at 3.) This deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or a motion requesting an extension of time. “If a plaintiff does not take advantage of the opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert the dismissal of the complaint dismissal of the entire action.” Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s action in its entirety and instructs the Clerk to close the case. /\ yy DATED: January 31, 2020 (ying (Byphan. 6 United States District Judge 2 oo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Outman v. Paramo, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Outman v. Paramo ((PC) Outman v. Paramo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lira v. Herrera
427 F.3d 1164 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)