(PC) Nguyen v. Stoller
Opinion
DAI NGUYEN, No. 2:23-CV-1157-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, Court of Appeals No. 24-5142
v. ORDER JOHN STOLLER, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Final judgment was entered on July 22, 2024, and this case is closed. Plaintiff has appealed. The matter was referred to the undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to certify whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith, in which case in forma pauperis status would be revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Having reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes in forma pauperis status should be revoked because, for the reasons discussed in detail in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations of June 17, 2024 (Docket No. 19), Plaintiff's appeal from this Court's final order dismissing the action for failure to state a claim is frivolous. 1} /// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Dated: August 29, 2024 44 4 , . ak. 1 / UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Nguyen v. Stoller ((PC) Nguyen v. Stoller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.