(PC) Negrete v. Dong

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE NEGRETE, No. 2:21-cv-0429 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 JULIE DONG, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On October 19, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within 30 days 18 and was warned that failure to do so would result in recommendation that this action be 19 dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 | (9th Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: December 3, 2021 Card Kt | ([z4 □□□ 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 fi 9 negr0429.fta 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28