(PC) Mullins v. Shasta County Jail

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL R. MULLINS, No. 2:24-cv-3697 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SHASTA COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 By order filed January 3, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave 19 to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 20 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 22 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 23 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 24 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 5 || Dated: February 19, 2025 □□□ Spo | CHI SOO KIM 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 /V/mull3697.fta 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28