(PC) Miller v. Ehlers

Opinion

ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:22-cv-1569 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS EHLERS, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated California law and acted in retaliation. By order dated March 2, 2023, the court screened and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, sought additional time to file an amended complaint, updated her1 address, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.2 Accordingly, the undersigned will

1 Plaintiff has identified herself as a transgender female (ECF No. 1 at 3), accordingly, where a pronoun is used to identify plaintiff, the pronouns “she” and “hers” will be used.

2 Records indicate that plaintiff has been transferred from San Quentin State Prison to California Medical Facility. See https://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/ (inmate locator website operated by the CDCR. This court may take judicial notice of such information. See Louis v. McCormick & recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign this action to a United States District Judge; and 2. A copy of this order shall be served on plaintiff at California Medical Facility. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: June 2, 2023 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DB:12 DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/mill1569.fta.f&r Schmick Restaurant Corp., 460 F. Supp. 2d 1153, 1155 fn.4 (C.D. Cal. 2006) (court may take judicial notice of state agency records); Pacheco v. Diaz, No. 1:19-cv-0774 SAB (PC), 2019 WL 5073594, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2019) (court may take judicial notice of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's inmate locator system). Pursuant to Local Rule 183(b) plaintiff is required to keep the court advised as to his current address.