(PC) Miller v. Bradford

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:21-cv-2000 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RAYMOND BRADFORD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed January 20, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. On February 8, 2022, plaintiff was informed that the 19 filing of the notice of amendment form, standing alone, was insufficient, and was reminded that 20 his amended complaint was due February 20, 2022. (ECF No. 12.) On February 24, 2022, the 21 order was re-served on plaintiff.1 Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has 22 not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 24 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 25

1 The order was re-served based on a change of address plaintiff filed in case no. 2:21-cv-1700 26 KJN. Plaintiff is advised that he is required to file a notice of change of address in each case 27 pending in this court; it is his responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is 28 fully effective. ] IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 2 | 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 5 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 6 || with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 8 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 9 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 || Dated: April 7, 2022 Aectl Aharon 12 KENDALL J.NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 jminzo00.ta 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28