(PC) Miller v. Amador County Jail

Opinion

BOBBY JOE DWAYNE MILLER, No. 2:22-cv-01094-KJM-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. By order filed December 16, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was granted an additional extension of time to file an amended complaint. The extended time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// 1] time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). | Dated: March 23, 2023 Card Kt | / ye □□□ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 12/mill1094. fta.docx