(PC) Mendoza v. Matteson

Opinion

JOHN GILBERT MENDOZA, No. 2:24-cv-0816 CKD P Plaintiff, v. G. MATTESON, et al., ORDER AND Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On October 2, 2024, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. In that order, plaintiff was warned that failure to file a second amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on November 4, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). || Dated: November 15, 2024 Card it | [. la (g— CAROLYN K DELANEY? UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE mendosi6.tta 1]